Spam Blocker Information

How Spammers Fool Rule-based and Signature-Based Spam Filters


Effectively stopping spam over the long-term requires much more than blocking individual IP addresses and creating rules based on keywords that spammers typically use. The increasing sophistication of spam tools coupled with the increasing number of spammers in the wild has created a hyper-evolution in the variety and volume of spam. The old ways of blocking the bad guys just don't work anymore.

Examining spam and spam-blocking technology can illuminate how this evolution is taking place and what can be done to combat spam and reclaim e-mail as the efficient, effective communication tool it was intended to be.

Heuristics (Rule-based Filtering)

One method used to combat spam is Rule-based, or Heuristic Filtering. Rule-based filters scan email content for predetermined words or phrases that may indicate a message is spam. For example, if an email administrator includes the word "sex" on a company's rule-based list, any email containing this word will be filtered.

The major drawback of this approach is the difficulty in identifying keywords that are consistently indicative of spam. While spammers may frequently use the words "sex" and 'Viagra" in spam emails, these words are also used in legitimate business correspondence, particularly in the healthcare industry. Additionally, spammers have learned to obfuscate suspect words by using spellings such as "S*E*X", or "VI a a GRR A".

It is impossible to develop dictionaries that identify every possible misspelling of "spammy" keywords. Additionally, because filtering for certain keywords produces large numbers of false positives, many organizations have found they cannot afford to rely solely on rule-based filters to identify spam.

Signature-Based Spam Filters

Another method used to combat spam is Signature-based Filtering. Signature-based filters examine the contents of known spam, usually derived from honey pots, or dummy email addresses set up specifically to collect spam. Once a honey pot receives a spam message, the content is examined and given a unique identifier. The unique identifier is obtained by assigning a value to each character in the email. Once all characters have been assigned a value, the values are totaled, creating the spam's signature. The signature is added to a signature database and sent as a regular update to the email service's subscribers. The signature is compared to every email coming in to the network and all matching messages are discarded as spam.

The benefit of signature-based filters is that they rarely produce false-positives, or legitimate email incorrectly identified as spam. The drawback of signature-based filters is that they are very easy to defeat. Because they are backward-looking, they only deal with spam that has already been sent. By the time the honey pot receives a spam message, the system assigns a signature, and the update is sent and installed on the subscribers' network, the spammer has already sent millions of emails. A slight modification of the email message will render the existing signature useless.

Furthermore, spammers can easily evade signature-based filters by using special email software that adds random strings of content to the subject line and body of the email. Because the variable content alters the signature of each email sent by the spammer, signature-based spam filters are unable to match the email to known pieces of spam.

Developers of signature-based spam filters have learned to identify the tell-tale signs of automated random character generation. But as is often the case, spammers remain a step ahead and have developed more sophisticated methods for inserting random content. As a result, most spam continues to fool signature-based filters.

The Solution

When used individually, each anti-spam technique has been systematically overcome by spammers. Grandiose plans to rid the world of spam, such as charging a penny for each e-mail received or forcing servers to solve mathematical problems before delivering e-mail, have been proposed with few results. These schemes are not realistic and would require a large percentage of the population to adopt the same anti-spam method in order to be effective. You can learn more about the fight against spam by visiting our website at www.ciphertrust.com and downloading our whitepapers.

Dr. Paul Judge is a noted scholar and entrepreneur. He is Chief Technology Officer at CipherTrust, the industry's largest provider of enterprise email security. The company's flagship product, IronMail provides a best of breed enterprise anti spam solution designed to stop spam, phishing attacks and other email-based threats. Learn more by visiting http://www.ciphertrust.com/products/spam_and_fraud_protection today.


MORE RESOURCES:

When 'Viagra' Comments on Your Blog, and Other Spam Red Flags
PCWorld
Matt Mullenweg, the creator of WordPress, actually created a spam blocker for WordPress called Akismet in 2005, partially so his mom wouldn't be assaulted by Viagra ads while writing her blog. Today, spam blockers do a good job of nabbing most spam, ...

and more »


Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security 2012 review
PC Advisor
Trend Micro Titanium Maximum Security 2012 starts out with traditional modules, including AV protection, an improved firewall, a spam blocker, parental control, a system tuner, protection against data theft and 10GB of online storage.



WatchGuard Breaks Quarterly Billings, Profit and Units Shipped Records
MarketWatch (press release)
Currently, WatchGuard offers seven add on security services for XTM appliances, including: Application Control, WebBlocker, Gateway Antivirus, Reputation Enabled Defense, spamBlocker, Intrusion Prevention and LiveSecurity.

and more »


NEWS ROUND-UP: The latest from WatchGuard, Compuware, and Island Pacific
ARNnet
WatchGuard currently offers seven add-on security services for XTM appliances: Application Control, WebBlocker, Gateway Antivirus, Reputation Enabled Defence, spamBlocker, Intrusion Prevention, and LiveSecurity. Technology performance company ...

and more »


Tucson victim stalked for nearly 2 decades
Tucson Citizen
... in consequence of which she tells numerous falsehoods to create the illusion of danger, purely to get someone incarcerated for up to 10 years merely because she doesn't want to use the spam blocker of her e-mail address account,” Shepard wrote.

and more »


When 'Viagra' comments on your blog, and other spam red flags
Computerworld New Zealand
Matt Mullenweg, the creator of WordPress, actually created a spam blocker for WordPress called Akismet in 2005, partially so his mom wouldn't be assaulted by Viagra ads while writing her blog. Today, spam blockers do a good job of nabbing most spam, ...

and more »


Gothamist

After Stalking Woman For 18 Years, Man Faces Five Year Sentence
Gothamist
... conscience or both, in consequence of which she tells numerous falsehoods to create the illusion of danger, purely to get someone incarcerated for up to 10 years merely because she doesn't want to use the spam blocker of her e-mail address account.

and more »


Demand for business security 'at an all-time high'
TechDay.co.nz
... core SMB market is 'solid', the company is experiencing 'accelerated demand' among mid-market and enterprise organisations, Robertson adds. Users are also increasingly taking up add-on services, such as Application Control, WebBlocker and spamBlocker.



ITespresso.fr

Sécurité IT : l'éditeur WatchGuard veut séduire les TPE et les PME
ITespresso.fr
... sécurité spécifiques comme le WebBlocker de WatchGuard (blocage des sites Web malveillants et des contenus Web inappropriés), le spamBlocker ou encore le Reputation Enabledd Defense, un service cloud de protection contextuelle contre les menaces.



Anti-Spam-Lösung für Unternehmen erhält Update
IT-Business
... das Reporting und Backups für geschützte Exchange-Cluster zentralisieren. Die Anti-Spam-Lösung ist Teil der Unternehmenslösung Kaspersky Open Space Security. Neben dem reinen Spam-Blocker gehören auch Antivirus-Funktionen mit zum Lieferumfang.

and more »

Google News

home | site map
© 2006